Skip to main content

Research

Research Notes Template

Research notes go wrong in two ways: you cannot tell where a claim came from, or you cannot tell whether it is still true. This template ties every finding to a source and a confidence level, keeps observation apart from interpretation, and records when you last checked.

Updated 2026-10-27

Copy and adapt

The template

Research notesTemplate

[Research topic], {{date}}

Question: [what you are trying to find out] Feeds into: [the paper, decision or article this is for] Project: [[Project name]] #research

Topic

[Two or three sentences of scope: what is in, what is out.]

Sources

  1. [Author, title, year, publication, link or DOI] ([read fully / skimmed / abstract only])
  2. ...

Key findings

  • [Finding in your own words] (source 1, p. [X]). Confidence: [high / medium / low]
  • [Finding] (source 2). Confidence: [...]

Observed vs interpreted

  • Observed: [what the source or the field actually showed]
  • My interpretation: [what you think it means, marked as yours]

Contradictions and gaps

  • [Source 1 says X, source 3 says Y. Possible reason: ...]

Questions

  • [What you still do not know, and where you might find it]

Next steps

  • [Next source to read or check to run] @due(YYYY-MM-DD)

Last checked: {{date}}

5 examples

Examples for different situations

The same structure, filled in for the situations people actually bring to it. Copy the one closest to yours.

1.Notes on a single study for a thesis

When it fits: Use this when one paper matters to your argument, you need to cite it accurately, and you have heard that later work complicated its result.

Notes on a single study for a thesisExample 1

Laptop vs longhand note-taking, 2026-10-21

Question: Does taking notes by hand improve conceptual learning compared with typing? Feeds into: Thesis chapter 2, section on note-taking and encoding Project: [[Thesis: note-taking and retention]] #research #thesis

Sources

  1. Mueller, P. A., and Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard. Psychological Science. (read fully)
  2. Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., and Rawson, K. A. (2019). How much mightier is the pen than the keyboard for note-taking? Educational Psychology Review. (read fully)

Key findings

  • Source 1: students who typed notes wrote more words and more verbatim transcription; longhand note-takers did better on conceptual questions in their studies. Confidence: high that this is what they reported.
  • Source 2: a replication found the longhand advantage was smaller and not reliable across conditions. Confidence: medium, sample sizes were modest.

Observed vs interpreted

  • Observed: the original studies measured learning shortly after a lecture video, in lab conditions.
  • My interpretation: the stronger claim is about verbatim copying, not about the device. Typing while summarizing may avoid the problem.

Contradictions and gaps

  • Neither source tests students who review their notes over weeks, which is how my participants study.

Next steps

  • Find studies that include delayed review @due(2026-10-31)
  • Ask my advisor whether to frame this as contested in the chapter @due(2026-10-28)

Last checked: 2026-10-21

2.Field notes from a bird survey

When it fits: Use this when you are recording in the field, conditions matter as much as counts, and someone else may need to repeat your survey next year from your notes alone.

Field notes from a bird surveyExample 2

Point count, Ridgeway Marsh station 4, 2026-10-18

Question: Are fall migrant numbers at the restored section higher than at the unrestored section? Feeds into: Volunteer survey report to the land trust, due 2026-12-01 Project: [[Ridgeway Marsh fall survey]] #research #fieldnotes

Conditions

  • 07:10 to 07:20, 10-minute count, 50 m radius
  • 8 C, overcast, wind light from the northwest, no rain
  • Water level high after Thursday's storm; mudflat on the east side covered

Counts

  • Red-winged Blackbird: 34 (one flock, flying over, not using the station)
  • Song Sparrow: 6
  • Great Blue Heron: 1, standing in the channel the whole count
  • Swamp Sparrow: 3, heard only
  • Yellow-rumped Warbler: 11 in the willows

Observed vs interpreted

  • Observed: no shorebirds. Last week, 9 Greater Yellowlegs at this station.
  • My interpretation: probably the high water covering the mudflat, not a real decline. Do not compare this count with last week's without a water-level note.

Next steps

  • Add a water-level column to the shared survey sheet @due(2026-10-21)
  • Repeat station 4 when the water drops @due(2026-10-25)

Last checked: 2026-10-18

3.Observation notes from a user study

When it fits: Use this when you are watching people do their real work, the useful details are timings and workarounds, and your team will be tempted to read their own opinions into what you saw.

Observation notes from a user studyExample 3

Warehouse picking observation, Dock B, 2026-11-03

Question: Why do pick errors double on the evening shift? Feeds into: Decision on whether to redesign the handheld scanner screen in Q1 Project: [[Scanner redesign discovery]] #research #observation

Setup

  • Shadowed two pickers, Kwame (4 years) and Lucía (3 weeks), 17:00 to 19:00
  • Shift lead Harriet agreed; both pickers told they could stop at any time

Observations

  • 17:22: Lucía scanned the bin label instead of the item. Screen showed a green tick anyway. She moved on.
  • 17:40: Kwame never looks at the screen after scanning. He listens for the beep: two beeps means wrong item, he says.
  • 18:05: Overhead lights in aisles 12 to 18 switch to half power after 18:00. Screen glare made the item name hard to read from where I stood.
  • 18:30: Lucía asked Kwame twice what a yellow banner meant. He said to ignore it.

Observed vs interpreted

  • Observed: the green tick appeared on a bin-label scan; the experienced picker relies on sound, the new one on the screen.
  • My interpretation: the screen may confirm the wrong thing, and new staff trust it. The lighting change may matter too. One evening is not enough to say which.

Questions

  • Does the green tick on a bin-label scan happen every time? Ask the scanner vendor.
  • Are evening errors concentrated in aisles 12 to 18?

Next steps

  • Pull error data by aisle and hour from the WMS (@Harriet) @due(2026-11-07)
  • Repeat the observation on a day shift for comparison @due(2026-11-10)

Last checked: 2026-11-03

4.Research log from an archive visit

When it fits: Use this when research happens over many sessions, most of what you look at turns out to be a dead end, and you need to remember what you already searched so you do not search it twice.

Research log from an archive visitExample 4

Research log: 1918 influenza in Calder County, 2026-11-14

Question: How did the county's schools and churches respond to the 1918 influenza outbreak? Feeds into: Talk for the historical society, February 2027 Project: [[1918 influenza local history]] #research #researchlog

Session 3: county historical society reading room, 10:00 to 15:30

Searched

  • Box 14, school board minutes 1916 to 1920, folders 2 to 5. Read all of autumn 1918.
  • Box 22, church bulletins, folder 1. Only 1919 survives. Dead end for 1918.
  • Microfilm reel 7 of the weekly newspaper, Sept to Dec 1918.

Found

  • School board minutes record schools closed for several weeks in October 1918, reopening in November. Exact dates on two pages; photographed both.
  • Newspaper notices list church services cancelled for three Sundays in October. Later issues report a new wave in December.

Not found

  • No death records in this collection. Staff say they are at the county clerk's office.

Observed vs interpreted

  • Observed: the newspaper and the board minutes agree on the closure but give reopening dates a week apart.
  • My interpretation: the board may have voted earlier than schools actually reopened. Need a third source.

Next steps

  • Request death records at the county clerk @due(2026-11-20)
  • Transcribe the two photographed minute pages @due(2026-11-17)

Last checked: 2026-11-14

5.Desk research for an article, with claims to re-check

When it fits: Use this when you are writing for publication, several figures come from reports that get updated, and you need to know which claims to check again before the piece goes out.

Desk research for an article, with claims to re-checkExample 5

Four-day work week trials, 2026-11-20

Question: What did the large four-day week pilots actually find, and what are the main criticisms? Feeds into: Newsletter issue 48, publishing 2026-12-04 Project: [[Newsletter: work and time]] #research #article

Sources

  1. The UK pilot report published in early 2023 by the organizers (read fully)
  2. Two critical commentaries on self-selection in the pilots (skimmed)
  3. A follow-up survey of participating companies (abstract only)

Key findings

  • The UK pilot ran for six months in 2022 with about 60 companies, and most continued the shorter week afterwards (source 1). Confidence: high for the pilot itself; check the current number still on it.
  • Companies volunteered to take part, so they were likely to be ones that expected it to work (source 2). Confidence: high, the organizers say this too.
  • Follow-up figures on how many companies kept the policy later (source 3). Confidence: low until I read beyond the abstract.

Contradictions and gaps

  • Headlines report revenue results, but only some companies shared revenue data. Say that in the piece.

Next steps

  • Read source 3 in full and update the follow-up figure @due(2026-11-27)
  • Re-check every figure in Key findings against the latest reports @due(2026-12-02)

Last checked: 2026-11-20

What belongs in research notes

A research notes template has to survive the gap between reading and writing. That gap is usually weeks, and in it you forget which source said what, how closely you read it, and which sentences were the author's and which were yours. Every section above exists to close one of those gaps.

  • A question and what it feeds. Without one, notes become a collection. With one, you can tell in a second whether a finding belongs.
  • Sources with full references. Write the full citation the first time. Reconstructing it later from a half-remembered title costs more than writing it now.
  • Findings tied to a source and a confidence level. "Most companies continued" is a note. "Most of about 60 companies continued after six months (source 1). Confidence: high, check the current figure" is research.
  • Contradictions and gaps. The places where sources disagree are often where your own contribution lives.
  • Next steps and a last-checked date. So the next session starts where this one stopped, and so you know how old each claim is.

Keep evidence and interpretation apart

The most common failure in research notes is not missing information. It is losing track of which statements are the source's and which are yours. Three weeks later, an inference you wrote down reads like a fact, and it ends up in a paper with a citation that does not support it.

The fix is mechanical. Mark every line as observed or interpreted, or keep them under separate headings as the template does. In field and observation notes this matters even more, because the observation is the evidence. "Lucía scanned the bin label and saw a green tick" is evidence. "The screen confuses new staff" is a hypothesis that needs more evenings.

Research log, field notes and observation notes

These are the same habit with different emphasis:

  • A research log is one dated entry per session, with what you searched, found and ruled out. Use it when research spans weeks, especially in archives and databases.
  • Field notes put conditions first (time, place, weather, method) because results are meaningless without them.
  • Observation notes record what people did, with timestamps, before any explanation. They are the raw material for user research, classroom observation and ethnography.

The template on this page works for all three. Rename the sections to fit, but keep observed and interpreted apart.

Keeping research notes true over time

The top research notes templates stop at the moment the notes are written. Research notes have a second life: they get reused for the next paper, quoted in a report, or picked up by a colleague. By then a figure may have been revised, a preprint published with different numbers, or a report updated.

Two habits help. First, the Last checked date at the bottom of every note, so age is visible. Second, a re-check step in Next steps for any claim that comes from something that changes: datasets, annual reports, pricing, policy, software documentation. Before you publish, run those checks again. It is a small cost compared with a correction notice.

Common mistakes

  • Copying paragraphs instead of writing findings. You end up rereading the source anyway.
  • No page numbers. Every citation becomes a search.
  • Mixing your ideas into source summaries. Mark them, every time.
  • Not logging dead ends. You will search the same place again in a month.
  • One giant document. Fine for a weekend. For a long project, one note per session, linked to a project note, stays navigable.

When to use a different template

When your notes are ready to become a written synthesis of a field, move to the literature review template. If you need a short evaluated summary per source for submission, use the annotated bibliography template. Lab experiments with protocols and results belong in a lab notebook, and interviews with users have their own structure in the user interview notes template.

Customization tips

  • Write the question before the sources

    Notes without a question become a pile of interesting facts. One sentence about what you are trying to find out, and what it feeds into, decides what goes in Key findings and what stays in the source.

  • Record how closely you read each source

    Read fully, skimmed or abstract only. Three weeks later you will not remember, and citing an abstract you never read past is how errors get into papers.

  • Confidence is about the claim, not the source

    A strong source can support a weak claim (a small subgroup, a single year). Rate each finding separately, and say why when it is low.

  • For field notes, conditions come first

    Time, place, weather, method and anything unusual go at the top. A count or an observation without conditions cannot be compared with next week's, as the bird survey example shows.

  • One running note or one note per session

    For a short task, one note with all sources is enough. For research over weeks, write one dated note per session (a research log) and link them all to one project note.

In the app

How to do this in Scribelet

  1. Create a new note and pick Research Notes from the template strip. It is one of the five built-in templates (Topic, Sources, Key Findings, Questions, Next Steps) and adds the #research tag.

  2. Want the fuller structure on this page? Open Desk Settings, then Templates, tap Add Template, paste it in and set the category to Research. Keep {{date}} in the title so each session note is dated.

  3. Photograph a field notebook page, an archive document or attach a PDF. Scribelet extracts the text and adds a caption, so a handwritten count or a scanned page becomes searchable alongside your notes.

  4. On Pro, background verification compares the factual claims in a note against the web and proposes changes you accept or dismiss, which catches a figure that was updated after you wrote it down. The stale checker also flags notes that are due for review.

  5. Link every session to one project note with [[1918 influenza local history]]. The project's backlinks panel becomes the research log, and the AI chat can answer "what have I found about school closures so far?" with citations to the session notes.

Templates, template variables and AI generation are documented in Note templates.

Frequently asked questions

How do you write good research notes?

Start with the question, give every finding a source and a page, write findings in your own words, and mark which statements are your interpretation. End each session with the next step, so the following session starts in minutes instead of rereading everything.

What is the difference between field notes and observation notes?

Field notes are taken on location, usually in natural settings or communities, and record conditions, method and what happened. Observation notes are the same habit applied to watching people do something, in research, user studies or classrooms. Both depend on separating what you saw from what you think it means.

What is a research log?

A dated record of each research session: what you searched, what you found, what turned out to be a dead end. Its main value is preventing you from searching the same box, database or keyword twice. The archive example above is a research log entry.

How do I organize research notes from many sources?

One note per source or session, all linked to one project note, with findings tagged by theme. When you are ready to write, gather findings by theme rather than by source. For an academic review, the literature review template shows that step.

How do I keep research notes from going out of date?

Add a Last checked date and a next step to re-check any figure that comes from a report or dataset that gets updated. Before you publish or cite, check those claims again against the current source. Notes that look finished are the ones most likely to be quietly wrong.

Research notes you can still trust when you publish

Start from the built-in Research Notes template in Scribelet, attach photos and PDFs so their text is searchable, and on Pro let verification flag claims that no longer match the web. Encrypted, free to start.

Free plan, no credit card. See pricing

Guide

Note Taking App for Researchers and PhD Students: Notes You Can Still Trust in Year Three

A research project outlives the notes most people take for it: by year three you cannot tell where a claim came from or why you made a decision in year one. This page says which tool fits which researcher (and what should stay in your reference manager), then gives a setup for literature notes, a research log and a weekly routine that keeps both usable.

Research

Literature Review Template

A literature review is an argument about what is known, built from sources, not a list of summaries. This template takes you from scope and search, through a source matrix, to one section per theme with agreement, disagreement and gaps. Pick the example organized the way your sources group.

Research

Annotated Bibliography Template

Each entry is a full citation in your assigned style followed by a short paragraph that summarizes the source, judges it, and says where it fits in your argument. Copy the template, then use the example closest to your course and citation style.

Research

Lab Notebook Examples and Template

A good lab notebook entry lets someone else repeat your work and see what you saw: what you meant to do, what you actually did, the raw numbers, the calculations, and what you will do next. Below are five complete entries from different kinds of labs and the template they share.

Product

User Interview Template

A user interview note is only useful if a teammate can tell what the participant said from what you concluded. This template keeps verbatim quotes, observed behavior and your interpretation in separate sections, ends with a three-line snapshot, and links every session to one study note for synthesis.

Study

Book Summary Template for Book Notes

A book summary is worth writing when it answers three questions a year later: what was the argument or story, what did I make of it, and what did I change because of it. Copy the template, or start from the example closest to the book on your nightstand.

We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Learn more