How they differ in practice
Most comparisons treat these as two note apps. They are not. Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) is a reading room: you bring in documents, it answers questions about them and points to the passage. Obsidian is a notebook: you write, link and rearrange your own notes, and the app stays out of the way.
That difference decides almost everything else. Gemini Notebook organizes by project, so each notebook has its own sources and nothing crosses between them. Obsidian organizes by connection, so a note about a person links to every meeting, book and decision that mentions them, and the backlinks panel shows you the links you did not make on purpose. Gemini Notebook does the reading for you and needs no setup. Obsidian does none of the reading and asks you to design a system.
Who should pick Gemini Notebook
- Your material is long documents written by someone else: papers, reports, transcripts, a course pack.
- The questions are about what those documents say, and you need to check the answer against the source.
- The project ends. You will not need the notebook in two years.
- You are fine with the sources living in your Google account.
Who should pick Obsidian
- Your material is your own writing, and it accumulates for years.
- You want to find connections between ideas rather than summaries of documents.
- You want files on your own disk that open in any text editor.
- You will spend a few evenings setting it up, and you enjoy that kind of work or at least tolerate it.
How to use both without making a mess
The setups that work all follow the same rule: Obsidian holds what you think, Gemini Notebook holds what you are reading.
- Start each research project with a new notebook and upload the sources. Ask your questions there.
- When an answer matters, write your own note about it in Obsidian, in your words, with a link to the source document. Do not paste the AI answer as if it were your conclusion.
- When you want the AI to work with your own notes, upload a handful of Markdown files from the vault as sources. Remember the limit of 50 per notebook on the free tier, and that the upload is a copy that will not update.
- When the project ends, export any notebook notes you want to keep to Google Docs, move the useful parts into Obsidian, and let the notebook go stale without regret.
The failure mode is the reverse: letting the notebook become the only place a conclusion exists. Google's help lists no bulk export, so a year of insights in notebook notes is a year you copy by hand.
The question most comparisons skip: where your thinking lives in five years
AI tools change names and limits often. This one changed its name in July 2026. A source notebook is easy to rebuild because the sources still exist. Your own notes are not. That is why the safest split puts your writing in a format you control and treats the AI as something that reads it, rather than somewhere it lives.
When neither is quite right
Some people want the middle: their own notes, with an AI that answers from them with citations, without uploading copies or configuring local models. Scribelet is one option there. It keeps notes in Markdown with wikilinks and backlinks, imports Obsidian vaults, answers from your notes in AI chat on the free plan, and exports everything to Markdown. It is hosted rather than local files, and it does not generate audio overviews, so Daniel and Priya from the examples above are better served by the two tools this page compares.
Your own notes, with an AI that cites them
Import your Obsidian vault into Scribelet, keep writing in Markdown with [[wikilinks]], and ask AI chat what your notes say, with citations back to each note. Free plan includes AI with daily limits, and everything exports to Markdown.
Free plan, no credit card. See pricing