How they differ in practice
Evernote is a filing cabinet with a very good search. You capture something (a web page, a receipt, a PDF, a voice memo), drop it in a notebook with a tag, and forget it. Months later you search for a word you remember, and Evernote finds it, even inside a scan. It works from the first minute and syncs through your account. The costs are a subscription past 50 notes, and an archive that lives on Evernote's servers in Evernote's format.
Obsidian is a folder of your own writing. Each note is a Markdown file. You link notes with [[double brackets]], every note shows what links to it, and the graph shows clusters you did not plan. There is no account, no note limit and no server unless you add Sync. The costs are setup, plugins for anything beyond the basics, and the absence of what Evernote does best: scanning, clipping into searchable documents, and finding text inside images.
Who should pick Obsidian
- You write more than you capture: research, drafts, journals, project thinking.
- Your notes get more useful the more they link to each other.
- You want plain files, no account and no lock-in.
- You are fine setting up sync or paying $4 a month for it.
Who should pick Evernote
- Most of what you keep is other people's documents: articles, receipts, scans, PDFs.
- You find things by searching for words inside those documents.
- You want an app that works without designing anything.
- You will pay for it.
Notion vs Obsidian vs Evernote
Many people searching this are choosing among three. Notion is the shared workspace: pages and databases for projects, wikis and anything with owners and dates. Obsidian is the private thinking tool. Evernote is the document archive. They overlap less than the search results suggest, and the common answer for a team is Notion for shared work plus one of the other two for personal notes. The Notion vs Evernote comparison and the Notion vs Obsidian post cover the other pairings.
The question most comparisons skip: what you lose when you leave Evernote
Every guide says the move is easy: export ENEX, run Obsidian's Importer, done. For your own typed notes, that is true. Notes arrive as Markdown with their tags. What the guides skip is search inside documents. In Evernote, a scanned letter is searchable by its contents. In Obsidian, it becomes an image or PDF attachment, and its text is invisible to search unless you add an OCR plugin. If half your archive is scans and clips, the move costs you the half you relied on search for.
So migrate in two parts. Move notebooks of your own writing first and check that links, tags and attachments survived. Then decide about the documents: keep Evernote for them, add OCR in Obsidian, or move them to a tool that extracts text from attachments.
When neither is the right answer
If you want your own Markdown notes, linked, with scans that stay searchable and an AI that answers from your notes with citations, each of these apps covers half. Scribelet is one option for the whole: Markdown with wikilinks and backlinks, an ENEX importer, attachments whose text is extracted, and full Markdown export. It is a hosted service, encrypted at rest rather than local files, so if you are Ines working for weeks without signal, Obsidian remains the right call.
The third option: Markdown notes with searchable attachments
Import your Evernote .enex export into Scribelet, keep writing in Markdown with wikilinks and backlinks, attach scans whose text is extracted so they are searchable, and ask the AI chat what your notes say, with citations. Free to start.
Free plan, no credit card. See pricing