How they differ in practice
Both apps store notes as Markdown and both are free. The difference you feel is in the first hour.
Open Joplin and you get notebooks on the left, a note list in the middle and an editor on the right. There is a toolbar, a to-do type with alarms, a web clipper, and OCR that makes text in screenshots and PDFs searchable. Sync is a dropdown: pick Dropbox, OneDrive, Nextcloud, WebDAV, S3 or Joplin Cloud. Encryption is a checkbox. It looks like Evernote did in 2015, which is either a comfort or a dealbreaker.
Open Obsidian and you get an empty folder. Notes are files, links are [[double brackets]], and the backlinks panel and graph show what connects to what. Everything else (tasks, calendars, kanban boards, databases) comes from core features you switch on or community plugins you choose. That is the appeal and the cost. The app becomes exactly what you build, and you maintain what you build.
Who should pick Joplin
- You want notebooks and tags, not a knowledge graph.
- You already pay for Dropbox, OneDrive or run Nextcloud, and do not want another subscription.
- Privacy matters and you want end-to-end encryption on whatever sync you use.
- You clip and scan, and want text in images and PDFs to be searchable without a plugin.
Who should pick Obsidian
- Your notes are worth more for how they connect than for what is in each one.
- You want plain files you can open with any editor, search with any tool and keep in Git.
- You like adjusting your tools and will maintain a few plugins.
- You are willing to pay $4 a month for Sync, or to run file sync yourself.
The question most comparisons skip: where the notes physically live
Most reviews say both apps are "Markdown," which hides the real difference. An Obsidian note is a .md file in a folder. You can back it up, rename it, open it in another app or delete it from your file manager, and Obsidian will notice. A Joplin note is Markdown text stored in Joplin's own database on each device. It is an open format and exports cleanly, but you reach your notes through Joplin or through an export.
This matters in two places. First, backups: copying an Obsidian folder is a complete backup, while for Joplin you export a JEX archive or Markdown on a schedule. Second, links: Joplin links point at internal note IDs, so they work perfectly inside Joplin and break outside it. Obsidian links point at note names, so they stay readable anywhere. If you might change apps in five years, that difference outweighs any feature in the tables above.
Moving between them
Joplin to Obsidian: export as Markdown with front matter, open the folder as a vault, then convert the ID links to note titles. Obsidian to Joplin: import the vault as a Markdown directory; folders become notebooks, and wikilinks stay as text until you relink them. In both directions, move one notebook first and search for ten things you know are in it.
When neither is the right answer
If you want linked Markdown notes but do not want to run sync, manage plugins or maintain a vault, both apps ask more of you than you want to give. Scribelet is one option there: Markdown notes with [[wikilinks]], backlinks and tags, on the web and iOS, an AI chat that answers from your own notes with citations, and full Markdown export. It is a hosted service, encrypted at rest with per-desk keys rather than end-to-end, so if Amira's client notes are your situation, Joplin on your own Nextcloud remains the better call.
The third option: linked Markdown notes without running sync
Import your Obsidian vault into Scribelet, keep writing in Markdown with wikilinks and backlinks, and ask the AI chat what your notes say, with citations. Free to start, and everything exports back to Markdown.
Free plan, no credit card. See pricing